ChatGPT帮助我进行学术写作的三种方式（转自Nature） 2024-06-22 摘录 1 条评论 1032 次阅读 原文：[Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing (nature.com)](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01042-3) 引用：Gruda D. Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing[J]. Nature, 2024. DOI：https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01042-3 **TLDR:** - 生成初稿 - 我正在为一家领先的 [学科] 学术期刊写一篇关于 [主题] 的论文。我在下面的部分试图说的是 [具体点]。为了清晰、连贯和简洁，请重新措辞，确保每一段都进入下一段。删除行话。使用专业的语气。 - I'm writing a paper on [topic] for a leading [discipline] academic journal. What I tried to say in the following section is [specific point]. Please rephrase it for clarity, coherence and conciseness, ensuring each paragraph flows into the next. Remove jargon. Use a professional tone. - 论文总结 - 假设你是一位在[领域]拥有20多年学术经验的专家和经验丰富的学者。根据我对[领域]中的一篇论文的总结，主要关注[一般主题]，按以下顺序对本文进行详细回顾: 1） 简要论述其核心内容；2） 确定其局限性；3）按重要性顺序解释每个限制的重要性。始终保持简洁和专业的语气。 - Assume you're an expert and seasoned scholar with 20+ years of academic experience in [field]. On the basis of my summary of a paper in [field], where the main focus is on [general topic], provide a detailed review of this paper, in the following order: 1) briefly discuss its core content; 2) identify its limitations; and 3) explain the significance of each limitation in order of importance. Maintain a concise and professional tone throughout. - 拒稿意见 - 在这些笔记的基础上，起草一封给作者的信。强调手稿的关键问题，并清楚地解释为什么手稿尽管主题有趣，但可能没有提供足够的实质性进展，不值得出版。避免使用行话。直截了当。始终保持专业和尊重的语气。 - On the basis of these notes, draft a letter to the author. Highlight the manuscript's key issues and clearly explain why the manuscript, despite its interesting topic, might not provide a substantial enough advancement to merit publication. Avoid jargon. Be direct. Maintain a professional and respectful tone throughout. **以下正文（机器翻译）：** Dritjon Gruda说，如果你负责任地使用它，生成式人工智能可以在写作、编辑和同行评审方面提供有价值的帮助。 Generative AI can be a valuable aid in writing, editing and peer review – if you use it responsibly, says Dritjon Gruda. 忏悔时间: 我使用生成式人工智能 (AI)。 Confession time: I use generative artificial intelligence (AI). 尽管关于聊天机器人在学术界是积极还是消极的力量存在争议，但我几乎每天都使用这些工具来完善我写的论文中的措辞，并寻求对我被要求评估的工作的替代评估，无论是审稿人还是编辑。我甚至帮助我完善这篇文章。 Despite the debate over whether chatbots are positive or negative forces in academia, I use these tools almost daily to refine the phrasing in papers that I"ve written, and to seek an alternative assessment of work I"ve been asked to evaluate, as either a reviewer or an editor. AI even helped me to refine this article. 我在葡萄牙的cat ó lica Porto商学院学习个性和领导力，并且是个性和个体差异以及领导者和领导力心理学的副编辑。 I study personality and leadership at Católica Porto Business School in Portugal and am an associate editor at Personality and Individual Differences and Psychology of Leaders and Leadership. 我从生成式人工智能中获得的价值不是来自技术本身盲目地大量生产文本，而是来自与工具的接触，并利用我自己的专业知识来完善它所产生的东西。 The value that I derive from generative AI is not from the technology itself blindly churning out text, but from engaging with the tool and using my own expertise to refine what it produces. 我和聊天机器人之间的对话不仅增强了我工作的连贯性，而且随着时间的推移，还教会了我如何以更简单的方式描述复杂的主题。无论你是在写作、编辑还是同行评审中使用人工智能，以下是它如何为你做同样的事情。 The dialogue between me and the chatbot both enhances the coherence of my work and, over time, teaches me how to describe complex topics in a simpler way. Whether you"re using AI in writing, editing or peer review, here"s how it can do the same for you. ## 润色学术写作（Polishing academic writing） 是否听说过地产的口头禅，“位置，位置，位置”？在生成人工智能的世界里，它是 “上下文，上下文，上下文”。 Ever heard the property mantra, "location, location, location"? In the world of generative AI, It's "context, context, context". 上下文是王。 Context is king. 你不能指望生成性人工智能 -- 或者任何东西或任何人 -- 在没有上下文的情况下，对一个问题提供有意义的回答。 You can"t expect generative AI — or anything or anyone, for that matter — to provide a meaningful response to a question without it. 当您使用聊天机器人来完善论文的一部分以使其清晰时，请先概述上下文。 When you"re using a chatbot to refine a section of your paper for clarity, start by outlining the context. 你的论文是关于什么的，你的主要论点是什么？用任何形式记下你的想法——即使是要点也能奏效。 What is your paper about, and what is your main argument? Jot down your ideas in any format — even bullet points will work. 然后，将此信息呈现给您选的生成AI。我通常使用由旧金山的OpenAI制造的ChatGPT， Then, present this information to the generative AI of your choice. I typically use ChatGPT, made by OpenAI in San Francisco, 但对于那些需要深入理解语言细微差别的任务，比如分析搜索查询或文本，我发现Google研究人员开发的Gemini特别有效。 California, but for tasks that demand a deep understanding of language nuances, such as analysing search queries or text, I find Gemini, developed by researchers at Google, to be particularly effective. 总部位于巴黎的Mixtral开发的开源大型语言模型非常适合离线工作，但仍然需要聊天机器人的帮助。 The open-source large language models made by Mixtral, based in Paris, are ideal when you"re working offline but still need assistance from a chatbot. --- 无论您选择哪种生成式AI工具，成功的关键在于提供精确的指令。越清楚越好。 Regardless of which generative-AI tool you choose, the key to success lies in providing precise instructions. The clearer you are, the better. 例如，你可以这样写: For example, you might write: “我正在为一家领先的 [学科] 学术期刊写一篇关于 [主题] 的论文。我在下面的部分试图说的是 [具体点]。为了清晰、连贯和简洁，请重新措辞，确保每一段都进入下一段。删除行话。使用专业的语气。”。 “I'm writing a paper on [topic] for a leading [discipline] academic journal. What I tried to say in the following section is [specific point]. Please rephrase it for clarity, coherence and conciseness, ensuring each paragraph flows into the next. Remove jargon. Use a professional tone.” 您可以稍后再次使用相同的技术，以澄清您对审阅者评论的回复。 You can use the same technique again later on, to clarify your responses to reviewer comments. --- 请记住，聊天机器人的第一个回复可能并不完美-这是一个协作和迭代的过程。 Remember, the chatbot's first reply might not be perfect — it's a collaborative and iterative process. 您可能需要完善您的说明或添加更多信息，就像您与同事讨论概念时一样。 You might need to refine your instructions or add more information, much as you would when discussing a concept with a colleague. 这是改善结果的互动。 It's the interaction that improves the results. 如果有什么东西没有达到目标，不要犹豫，说，“这不是我的意思。让我们调整这一部分。” If something doesn't quite hit the mark, don't hesitate to say, “This isn't quite what I meant. Let's adjust this part.” 或者你可以推荐它的改进:“ 这更清晰，但让我们调整一下结尾，以便更强烈地过渡到下一节。” Or you can commend its improvements: “This is much clearer, but let's tweak the ending for a stronger transition to the next section.” --- 这种方法可以将一项具有挑战性的任务转变为一项可管理的任务，让页面充满你自己可能没有完全收集到的见解。 This approach can transform a challenging task into a manageable one, filling the page with insights you might not have fully gleaned on your own. 这就像是一场开启新视角的对话，让生成性人工智能成为开发和提炼想法的创造性过程中的合作伙伴。 It's like having a conversation that opens new perspectives, making generative AI a collaborative partner in the creative process of developing and refining ideas. 但重要的是，你正在使用人工智能作为一个传声筒: 它不是为你写文件；它也没有审查手稿。 But importantly, you are using the AI as a sounding board: it is not writing your document for you; nor is it reviewing manuscripts. ## 提升同行评审 Elevating peer review 生成人工智能可以成为同行评审过程中的一个有价值的工具。 Generative AI can be a valuable tool in the peer-review process. 在彻底阅读手稿后，总结要点和复习领域。 After thoroughly reading a manuscript, summarize key points and areas for review. 然后，使用人工智能帮助组织和表达您的反馈（无需直接输入或上传手稿的文本，从而避免隐私问题）。 Then, use the AI to help organize and articulate your feedback (without directly inputting or uploading the manuscript's text, thus avoiding privacy concerns). 例如，你可以指导人工智能: For example, you might instruct the AI: “假设你是一位在[领域]拥有20多年学术经验的专家和经验丰富的学者。根据我对[领域]中的一篇论文的总结，主要关注[一般主题]，按以下顺序对本文进行详细回顾: 1） 简要论述其核心内容；2） 确定其局限性；3）按重要性顺序解释每个限制的重要性。始终保持简洁和专业的语气。” “Assume you're an expert and seasoned scholar with 20+ years of academic experience in [field]. On the basis of my summary of a paper in [field], where the main focus is on [general topic], provide a detailed review of this paper, in the following order: 1) briefly discuss its core content; 2) identify its limitations; and 3) explain the significance of each limitation in order of importance. Maintain a concise and professional tone throughout.” --- 我发现人工智能的合作伙伴关系可以令人难以置信地丰富；这些工具经常提供我没有考虑过的观点。 I've found that AI partnerships can be incredibly enriching; the tools often offer perspectives I hadn't considered. 例如，ChatGPT擅长解释和证明我在综述中发现的特定局限性背后的原因，这有助于我理解该研究贡献的更广泛含义。 For instance, ChatGPT excels at explaining and justifying the reasons behind specific limitations that I had identified in my review, which helps me to grasp the broader implications of the study's contribution. 如果我确定了方法上的局限性，ChatGPT可以详细阐述这些局限性，并在修订中提出克服这些局限性的方法。 If I identify methodological limitations, ChatGPT can elaborate on these in detail and suggest ways to overcome them in a revision. 这种反馈通常有助于我将局限性及其对论文整体贡献的集体影响联系起来。 This feedback often helps me to connect the dots between the limitations and their collective impact on the paper's overall contribution. 然而，它的建议有时是离经叛道、牵强、无关紧要或根本错误的。 Occasionally, however, its suggestions are off-base, far-fetched, irrelevant or simply wrong. 这就是为什么审查的最终责任始终由您承担。审稿人必须能够区分什么是事实，什么不是事实，没有聊天机器人能够可靠地做到这一点。 And that is why the final responsibility for the review always remains with you. A reviewer must be able to distinguish between what is factual and what is not, and no chatbot can reliably do that. ## 优化编辑反馈 Optimizing editorial feedback 我从使用聊天机器人中受益的最后一个领域是我作为期刊编辑的角色。 The final area in which I benefit from using chatbots is in my role as a journal editor. 向作者提供建设性的编辑反馈可能很有挑战性，尤其是当你每周监督几篇手稿时。 Providing constructive editorial feedback to authors can be challenging, especially when you oversee several manuscripts every week. 我个人收到了无数无益的、不具体的反馈，比如“经过仔细考虑，我们决定不再处理你的手稿”，我认识到清晰和建设性沟通的重要性。 Having personally received countless pieces of unhelpful, non-specific feedback — such as, “After careful consideration, we have decided not to proceed with your manuscript” — I recognize the importance of clear and constructive communication. ChatGPT在这个过程中变得不可或缺，它帮助我在不取代人类编辑决策的情况下，制定准确、富有同情心和可操作的反馈。 ChatGPT has become indispensable in this process, helping me to craft precise, empathetic and actionable feedback without replacing human editorial decisions. 例如，在评估了一篇论文并指出其利弊后，我可能会将这些信息输入ChatGPT，并让它起草一封合适的信: For instance, after evaluating a paper and noting its pros and cons, I might feed these into ChatGPT and get it to draft a suitable letter: “在这些笔记的基础上，起草一封给作者的信。强调手稿的关键问题，并清楚地解释为什么手稿尽管主题有趣，但可能没有提供足够的实质性进展，不值得出版。避免使用行话。直截了当。始终保持专业和尊重的语气。” “On the basis of these notes, draft a letter to the author. Highlight the manuscript's key issues and clearly explain why the manuscript, despite its interesting topic, might not provide a substantial enough advancement to merit publication. Avoid jargon. Be direct. Maintain a professional and respectful tone throughout.” 同样，可能需要几次迭代才能使基调和内容恰到好处。我发现这种方法既提高了我的反馈质量，又有助于确保我以支持的方式传达我的想法。 Again, it might take a few iterations to get the tone and content just right.I've found that this approach both enhances the quality of my feedback and helps to guarantee that I convey my thoughts supportively. 其结果是编辑和作者之间进行了更加积极和富有成效的对话。 The result is a more positive and productive dialogue between editors and authors. 毫无疑问，生成人工智能给科学界带来了挑战。 There is no doubt that generative AI presents challenges to the scientific community. 但它也可以提高我们的工作质量。 But it can also enhance the quality of our work. 这些工具可以增强我们的写作、复习和编辑能力。 These tools can bolster our capabilities in writing, reviewing and editing. 它们保留了科学探究的本质——好奇心、批判性思维和创新——同时改善了我们交流研究的方式。 They preserve the essence of scientific inquiry — curiosity, critical thinking and innovation — while improving how we communicate our research. 考虑到这些好处，你还在等什么？ Considering the benefits, what are you waiting for? 标签: none 本作品采用 知识共享署名-相同方式共享 4.0 国际许可协议 进行许可。
Ai人工智能确实可以帮我们很多👍